The Challenge
Set against the backdrop of Aotearoa New Zealand’s housing crisis, this research was part of an MBIE funded Public Housing and Urban Regeneration Programme hosted by University of Otago. It addressed a context characterised by housing stress, inequality, and increasing pressure on the public housing sector to deliver improved wellbeing outcomes.
The programme focused on how different housing providers and regeneration models contributed to tenant and community wellbeing. There were a number of workstreams; TUA supported the design and delivery of the governance research strand.
At its core, the challenge was to understand how governance models could inform future large-scale regeneration programmes, how investment frameworks could better align with systems-level wellbeing, and how political, institutional, and partnership dynamics influenced long-term outcomes.
The Solution
The research adopted a structured, multidisciplinary approach embedded within the Public Housing and Urban Regeneration programme. It was centred on seven case study organisations — Kāinga Ora, Tāmaki Regeneration Company, Wellington City Council, Ōtautahi Community Housing Trust, Wainuiomata Marae Charitable Trust, Salvation Army, and Dwell — selected to reflect a range of governance models and scales.
The methodology integrated literature review, policy and organisational analysis, and the thematic coding of governance documentation and interviews. Governance structures and inter-organisational relationships were mapped to understand how collaboration operated in practice and how decisions were made across institutional boundaries.
TUA played a key role in research design, analysis, and strategic advisory, across the governance research strand, contributing specialist expertise, and translating findings into accessible outputs for policy and industry audiences.
The Journey
The case studies provided a diverse evidence base, spanning large Crown entities, local government, and community and iwi-led organisations. The process combined document analysis, governance mapping, and interviews with senior leaders, with findings synthesised through thematic analysis. This approach identified common patterns, divergences, and tensions in how governance operated and evolved over time.
Key insights highlighted the importance of clear and enduring mandates, diverse and representative governance structures, and early alignment of success measures with wellbeing outcomes. The research also underscored the need for consistent funding approaches and strong cross-sector partnerships to enable effective delivery at scale.
Together, these findings informed a practical framework for strengthening governance in future public housing-led regeneration programmes, with a focus on achieving long-term, equitable wellbeing outcomes for tenants, whānau, and communities.